![]() |
|
|||
|
“Buy Local:” Challenging cooperatives and
producer groups to lead this opportunity
“Buy local” ought to be a good
thing for Northeast agriculture. For
years, it’s been an article of faith for
our industry, finding nearness to
market and millions of consumers in
our backyard as major competitive
advantages. Many have turned that advantage into
value-added in the cash register at the farm market. A healthy Northeast agriculture needs a market premium to sustain itself. We know that average farm real estate values here are well above national averages, and Northeast farmers often have the option to sell land out of agriculture at an attractive price. First Pioneer’s Knowledge Exchange recently reported on farm labor availability, citing government statistics that show our Northeast states have among the highest average wage rates in the country, against which farm employers must compete. Studies on the cost of doing business by state consistently rank five of our Northeast states among the most expensive locations to do business, which affects farmers as well as the businesses that serve them. I wonder what the “rules of the game” are for claiming that a product is local. Who enforces those rules? Having watched the debacle of labeling packaged milk as “rbST free,” I’m convinced that virtually all of the “value-added” went to supermarkets and processors, not to farm producers whose cost of production is impacted by whether or not they use rbST.
What does “locally produced” actually mean on a carton of milk and who ultimately benefits from this marketing claim? Just supermarkets and processors, which seem to have been the winners in rbST-free labeling and pricing? Do “local” dairy farmers (dedicated and stubborn enough to still farm in the Northeast) get their fair share of any premium? And what exactly is “locally produced” milk? Similar to bottled water, can any milk go into a carton labeled “local,” with the processor and supermarket pocketing the advantage? “Buy local” is certainly worthy of identifying real value-added opportunities for Northeast agriculture. I know some groups are already considering how to make the most of this opportunity. For example, Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture (CISA), a western Massachusetts group, is actively pursuing a coalition of food buyers, a local supermarket chain, agribusinesses and, of course, local farmers to develop an infrastructure in which to seize the “buy local” market. Leadership and collaboration is vital for the Northeast to make the most of this exciting marketing opportunity. It’s time for innovation and fresh thinking about partnering in nontraditional ways. I hope that cooperatives and producer groups will be at the forefront, rather than letting supermarket chains and national processors capture all of the value-added. And I hope that government will take a fair, but tough, approach to enforcing truth-in-labeling regulations so “locally produced” claims can retain the credibility and value they deserve. We, at First Pioneer, are
excited about the opportunities for “locally produced” in the Northeast
regardless of how individual businesses may pursue it. Our First Pioneer
team is eager to assist you — individually or as groups — to make the most
of the “buy local” movement. Read the rest of the issue which includes:
|
Board Financial Highlights Seminars Available Customer Service Councils Customer meetings It's Prime Time to Borrow Loan Funds Cost of Money President's Messages on: Buy Local Failure of Congressional... Subprime lending is a bad.. |
|||
|
Back
to top Home | Governance | Financial Highlights | About Us | Financial Solutions | Notebook | Community Links | Online Banking | Search | Site Map | Contact Us ©
1999-2008 First Pioneer Farm Credit, ACA. All rights reserved. |
||||